Decision making process in business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Decision making process in business - Essay ExampleIn well known case Donogue VS Stevenson * the Court decided that the manufacturer is credible for the act through with(p) because everybody owes a duty of reasonable business organisation to their neighbour.In this case Mrs. Donogue made a valid claim that her continuous disorder is due to the consumption of drink in which the decomposed snail was found and it was due to the negligence of manufacturer Mr. Stevenson. presently lets discuss how the above said principles are applicable to the given cases and also well advise the parties to the case that how potentiometer they resort to these principles to get the benefit of the Law.Since the maintaining the activities of the park in a proper manner are the kickoff and foremost duty of the topical anaesthetic council as the maintainer of the park, it owes some duty towards others. The topical anaesthetic council must overhear reasonable standard of care regarding the activities of the park so that it should not cause any misuse to the passersby. In the famous case Boulton VS Stone** it was held that defendant should take reasonable care to avoid injuries.here also. ... ue the local council as the defendant for the negligence in the light of above principles and she is entitled to get compensation from the local council.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*Donogue VS Stevenson 1932 ,A.C 532 1932 S.C 3 ** Boulton VS Stone2Miss. Marples case The principles regarding the negligence discussed above are applicablehere also. The gardner had to take reasonable care in arranging the flower pot in the right side of the path so that harm to the others should be avoided .Here it is obvious that the gardner has done the breach of duty by arranging the pots in the wrong side, consequently Mrs.Marple can file a case against the gardner as defendant and entitled to get compensation from him for the harm cause d to her.Mrs.Turtles CaseIt is apparent from above discussions that Mrs. Turtle can action the Local council and the doctor as defendants and they are liable to pay off the damages. As said before the local council had to exercise due cares regarding the maintenance of those walkover amenities in the park as same way in the activities of the park. Mrs. Turtle can sue the doctor as there was a breach of duty on the part of doctor. If he attend Gemma in appropriate manner, Gemma would be alright. The doctor could do some other arrangements to get X-ray done .Instead of this, he just asked the nurse to bandage Gemmas injured ankle and consequently she had permanent limb.From above it is clean up that a person is liable to